🔗 Share this article

T respite following the halt in hostilities in Gaza is substantial. Across Israel, the freeing of surviving detainees has resulted in extensive joy. In Gaza and the West Bank, festivities are also underway as up to 2,000 Palestinian inmates are being freed – even as anguish persists due to ambiguity about who is being freed and their destinations. In northern Gaza, civilians can now go back to dig through rubble for the remnants of an estimated 10,000 missing people.

Peace Breakthrough Contrary to Prior Uncertainty

Just three weeks ago, the likelihood of a ceasefire appeared remote. Yet it has been implemented, and on Monday Donald Trump journeyed from Jerusalem, where he was hailed in the Knesset, to Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt. There, he joined a high-level diplomatic gathering of over 20 world leaders, featuring Sir Keir Starmer. The peace initiative launched at that summit is due to be continued at a assembly in the UK. The US president, acting with international partners, successfully brokered this deal happen – contrary to, not due to, Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Aspirations for Sovereignty Qualified by Historical Realities

Hopes that the deal marks the opening phase toward Palestinian statehood are comprehensible – but, in light of previous instances, slightly idealistic. It offers no clear path to independence for Palestinians and endangers separating, for the foreseeable future, Gaza from the West Bank. Additionally the utter devastation this war leaves behind. The lack of any timeline for Palestinian autonomy in the US initiative gives the lie to boastful references, in his Knesset speech, to the “monumental start” of a “era of prosperity”.

The US president could not resist dividing and personalising the deal in his speech.

In a moment of ease – with the liberation of detainees, halt in fighting and resumption of aid – he opted to reframe it as a morality play in which he solely restored Israel’s honor after supposed treachery by previous American leaders Obama and Biden. This despite the Biden administration a year ago having undertaken a similar deal: a ceasefire linked to aid delivery and future negotiations.

Substantive Control Vital for Authentic Resolution

A plan that withholds one side genuine autonomy is incapable of delivering legitimate peace. The truce and relief shipments are to be applauded. But this is not yet diplomatic advancement. Without mechanisms ensuring Palestinian participation and control over their own establishments, any deal risks cementing domination under the language of peace.

Humanitarian Priorities and Reconstruction Challenges

Gaza’s people urgently require emergency support – and nutrition and medication must be the initial concern. But reconstruction should not be postponed. Amid 60 million tonnes of debris, Palestinians need support reconstructing residences, educational facilities, medical centers, places of worship and other establishments shattered by Israel’s military operation. For Gaza’s transitional administration to thrive, funding must arrive promptly and security gaps be remedied.

Similar to a large portion of Donald Trump's resolution initiative, mentions to an international stabilisation force and a proposed “diplomatic committee” are disturbingly unclear.

Worldwide Endorsement and Potential Developments

Robust global backing for the Palestinian Authority, enabling it to replace Hamas, is perhaps the most encouraging scenario. The tremendous pain of the recent period means the moral case for a solution to the conflict is possibly more critical than ever. But while the truce, the homecoming of the hostages and commitment by Hamas to “demilitarise” Gaza should be recognized as favorable developments, Mr Trump’s history offers minimal cause to have faith he will fulfill – or deem himself compelled to endeavor. Temporary ease does not mean that the likelihood of a Palestinian state has been advanced.