🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect women from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The final decision now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both within the country and internationally.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a national petition demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for further review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect similar discussions in additional member states