🔗 Share this article

As a game master, I traditionally shied away from significant use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying adventures. I preferred was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be guided by character actions instead of the roll of a die. However, I chose to change my approach, and I'm truly glad I did.

The Inspiration: Watching 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known streamed game showcases a DM who regularly calls for "luck rolls" from the adventurers. He does this by choosing a type of die and outlining consequences based on the number. This is at its core no different from using a random table, these get invented on the spot when a character's decision lacks a clear resolution.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own game, mainly because it seemed novel and offered a break from my usual habits. The experience were eye-opening, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing tension between preparation and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

A Powerful Session Moment

In a recent session, my party had survived a large-scale conflict. When the dust settled, a cleric character wondered if two beloved NPCs—a sibling duo—had lived. In place of choosing an outcome, I handed it over to chance. I told the player to roll a d20. The stakes were: a low roll, both died; on a 5-9, a single one succumbed; on a 10+, they survived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a incredibly emotional scene where the adventurers found the remains of their friends, forever holding hands in their final moments. The party conducted last rites, which was especially powerful due to earlier story developments. As a parting reward, I improvised that the remains were strangely restored, showing a magical Prayer Bead. By chance, the bead's magical effect was precisely what the party needed to address another major quest obstacle. It's impossible to orchestrate this type of serendipitous story beats.

Honing Your Improvisation

This event led me to ponder if improvisation and making it up are in fact the essence of this game. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt can rust. Groups often excel at ignoring the most detailed plots. Therefore, a good DM needs to be able to adapt swiftly and fabricate content in real-time.

Employing similar mechanics is a excellent way to train these abilities without straying too much outside your preparation. The trick is to deploy them for low-stakes situations that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to determine if the king's advisor is a traitor. However, I would consider using it to figure out whether the PCs reach a location right after a critical event takes place.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

Spontaneous randomization also helps make players feel invested and cultivate the impression that the adventure is responsive, shaping based on their decisions immediately. It prevents the perception that they are merely actors in a pre-written narrative, thereby strengthening the cooperative aspect of roleplaying.

This philosophy has long been integral to the original design. Original D&D were enamored with encounter generators, which suited a game focused on exploration. Although contemporary D&D often focuses on plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, that may not be the best approach.

Achieving the Sweet Spot

Absolutely no problem with being prepared. But, equally valid no issue with stepping back and permitting the rolls to decide some things rather than you. Authority is a big part of a DM's responsibilities. We require it to manage the world, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, even when doing so might improve the game.

The core recommendation is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Experiment with a little improvisation for minor outcomes. You might just discover that the organic story beat is infinitely more powerful than anything you could have planned on your own.